Hello Chazwin.... I found another Google Group... or message board..... only been on it a few days, myself.... http://groups.google.com/group/number-71 This one is "moderator-free".... no one to kick "us" off.... so they say. It's small in terms of members as yet... and there's a lot of mutual abuse going on amongsts and between one or more of the members.... but there does appear to be one or more reasonable "folks" to talk to.... work in progress..... chance to make it into something perhaps worthwhile.... come over and "chat", with me, if none other..... nominal9
On Oct 4, 4:48 pm, Chazwin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 2, 2:07 pm, einseele <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > This group is lately almost silent > > My subject is linguistics, so I will take advantage of this silence to > > point the obvious, which is usually not so clear. > > > When talking, in any language, there is always a silent portion/ > > segment, words, letters, sentences, need that silence to identify > > itselves. > > > Also when we write. Silence when we write is represented by "empty" > > space. > > > There is empty space in all cases, or silence. Being perhaps the most > > important component of language. > > > Even if I write: > > > thisgroupislatelyalmostsilentmysubjectislinguisticssoiwilltakeadvantageofth > > issilencetopointtheobviouswhichisusuallynotsoclear > > > Even so, to convey any meaning the reader will add "missing" "empty" > > space to the above, which is the first sentence of this post. > > > Silence, empty space, or whatever instance this represents, conveys > > meaning. It is not null, but empty. This means that in language, > > emptiness is treated the same way as any positive sign. > > > As in computer science as well, where the sign "0" represents the > > absence of a material dot. > > Binary systems need 2 values and curiously, the first is "0" > > > That absence has no lesser status that any other sign, and more than > > that is needed as part of the system. > > > If this is valid to language, and there are a lot of languages (also > > not human), why should be any different in Physics, or Nature, or > > Chemistry, whatever. > > > It is hard to see out there knowledge approaches talking about > > emptiness in this sense, there are examples of course. Poetry for > > instance, and many other. > > > rgds- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
