Argumentum Ornitologicum I close my eyes and so I see a flock of birds. The vision elapses a second, may be less; I don´t know how many birds I saw. Was the number of birds definite or indefinite? The problem involves the existence of God. If God exists, the number is definite, because God knows how many birds I did saw. If God does not exist, the number is indefinite, because no one could have that counted. At any rate I saw less than ten birds (let´s say) and more than one, but I did not see nine, eight, seven, six, five, four, three or two birds. I saw a number between ten and one, which is not nine , eight, seven, six, five, and so on. That integer is inconceivable. Therfore, God exists.
On 5 nov, 11:34, socratus <[email protected]> wrote: > God and Consciousness. > > Mr. ‘FF ’ wrote: > > ‘ There is only one place where "God" has been > demonstrated, even proven to exist - in human brains.’ > === . > God and Consciousness. > > It seems you are right saying: ‘There is only one place > where "God" has been demonstrated, even proven > to exist - in human brains.’ > Why? Because if God exist, HE /SHE/ IT must be > in every place it means in human brains too. > Question: is it possible to prove this ? > I will try. > Our brain works on dualistic basis: usually consciousness > (logically) and rarely unconsciousness ( at first it seems > illogically but at last it shows as very wise act) . > In his book ‘ The Holographic Universe’ Michael Talbot > on the page 160 explained this situation in such way: > ‘ Contrary to what everyone knows it is so, it may not be > the brain that produce consciousness, but rather consciousness > that creates the appearance of the brain - . . . .’ > But as the ‘Bhagavad Gita’ says: > Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form. > They do not know My transcendental nature and > My supreme dominion over all that be. > / Chapter 9. Text 11./ > ========== . . > Best wishes. > Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus. > > http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=23624&st=15http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=2547&st=105http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=2548 > > ================== . . --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
