A pure vacuum would be empty space. Yet wherever there is space, there are also gravity waves,and there is time. So the space is not entirely empty. Therefore there is no true vacuum. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On May 6, 1:20 pm, einseele <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes there is vacuum in any discrete order, the distance between > elements is pure vaccum > For instance the chain of integers, or the space between words I'm > writing here > (The statemente that space here is also a sign is not valid, as it is > there just for that, to represent the neccessary vacuum needed) > > if not, read this below (above no spacing) > > Yestherecanbevacuuminanydiscreteorder,thedistancebetweenelementsispurevaccumForinstancethechainofintegers,orthespacebetweenwordsI'mwritinghere > (Thestatementethatspacehereisalsoasignisnotvalid,asitistherejustforthat,torepresenttheneccessaryvacuumneeded) > > On 6 maio, 13:16, Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > My understanding of CERN is that while they hope to find the Higgs > > Boson, > > that is not the total intent and purpose. > > Colliders basically are predicated on child's play. > > Let's smash these two things together as hard as we can, > > and see what happens. > > The chief flaw in all this is that so many things happen so fast, from > > the collisions, > > that statistical software must be employed to sift and analyze the > > emitted data. > > How good is that software? > > Are there significant data bits that are being ignored, lost, or > > misinterpreted? > > We don't know. > > As to all this talk about vacuum, I am not a physicist, so I get > > confused immediately > > before you get to the E=MC squared part. > > But we do know that vacuum, in concept, is pure space. > > Can there be any such thing as pure space? > > Space exists only in the context of matter, energy and time. > > Indeed, all four of the components of space-time-energy-mass > > exist only in the context of each other. > > So a pure vacuum may be the sound of one hand clapping. > > And none of the four components in any combination explains conscious > > awareness (much less free will). > > We think we are so smart. > > But the human brain has limits, and even the most intelligent human > > may be unable to > > even begin to comprehend the essentials of physics. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > On May 6, 6:59 am, sadovnik socratus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Two ways to God Particle. > > > 1 > > > One way to find God Particle is CERN. > > > The result of the CERN experiment can be received > > > only in the reference frame of vacuum. > > > The vacuum is the most important part of CERN. > > > 2 > > > Another way to find God Particle takes its beginning > > > from QED. QED says: all electron parameters in > > > interaction with vacuum become infinite. But this is > > > forbidden by " The Law of Conservation and > > > Transformation of Energy". Question: > > > How the electron will regenerate from the vacuum? > > > 3 > > > So, CERN and QED cannot exist without vacuum. > > > Questions: What is vacuum: T=0K ? > > > Which kind of particles can exist in T=0K condition? > > > 4 > > > I say, that Third Law of Thermodynamics gives the answer: > > > the particles in T=0K condition don’t have volume and > > > therefore they must be flat circle/ disc particles: c/d=pi=3,14 . . . > > > And if vacuum is some kind of energy space – so the particles > > > also must be some kind of energy particles with potential > > > energy: E=Mc^2. > > > And if vacuum is some kind of thermodynamics space – so > > > the particles must have potential gravity mass: R/N=k. > > > > And when I posted my opinion I received emails from some > > > persons with Ph.D in their pockets: idiot, moron, cretin . . . > > > . . . drink your cup of hemlock. > > > 5 > > > Where is my mistake? > > > 6 > > > On my opinion, to search God Particle using CERN > > > is mad project. It is better ( and maybe it is cheaper too) > > > to understand: What is electron? > > > How the electron regenerates from the vacuum? > > > And if we understand what electron is, we will also > > > understand that CERN is the big pyramid in the XXIc. > > > =====================. > > > Best wishes. > > > Israel Sadovnik Socratus > > > ==================. > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Epistemology" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Epistemology" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
