On 7 May, 09:46, awori achoka <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed. Vacuum is in our conscience. > ================================================== How can the problem of the vacuum energy be resolved ? 1 After big bang the T=2,7K is going down and in the future will reach T=0K. 2 The cosmological constance (critical density) in the Universe is near zero. 3 In the physical labaratory physicists have reached T=0,001K or maybe T=0,0001K. Why cannot the Universe ( as whole) have this parameter ? 4 My question: Which kind of particles can exist in T=0K or in T=0,001K or near T=0K condition? ===========================. a) T=0K is not ‘nothing’ space, but it is a Negative space (-273,15 ) which is filled with ‘virtual negative particles’. Mathematical they describe not as zero (0), but with imaginary numbers: i^2=-1. It means mathematically they can be in two conditions: positive and negative . b) Sommerfeld had possibility to write electron as: e^2=ah*c; it means, electron can be in two conditions: positive e= +ah*c and negative e= -ah*c. c) Dirac wrote two (2) formulas of electron’s energy; it means, the electron’s energy can be in two conditions: positive +E=Mc^2 and negative -E=Mc^2. d) Can theory of electron describe the problem of the vacuum energy? ===============================. Socratus.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
