> Ha xxxxing Ha. In other words you can't begin to back up what you say.

Can you back that up?
>
> Contradiction! you either accept that the press is right wing (which
> it is),

Can you back that up?

> OR you can say that the press is left and is shooting itself in the
> foot by reporting these stories.

The press in the US is not a monolith.
But darn.  I can't back that up.

>  IN any event you REALLY need to learn how to think.

So that I can apply brilliant statements, like, Ha xxxxing ha, as
substitutes for thoughtful discourse?
I'll be right on it.

> > Essential studies have been diminished in favor of so-called "tree-
> > hugging" curricula.
>
> That is clearly bullxxxx propaganda. No one except the right wing
> press would call it 'tree hugging'.

Then let's call it, oh, ecologic sensitivity.
It still does not teach anyone anything useful.
It is leftist propaganda pure and simple.
>
> You need to stop reading newspapers for idiots and get out of the
> house.

As I said before, we conservatives in the US have constant exposure to
the ideas of the left.
We are inundated with them.
And I must also say, my liberal friends locally are much more
civilized and intelligent
than the incendiary name-callers that speak as you speak.
They actually present their ideas clearly, and oh yes, they back them
up.
>
> > Which is why the US continues to falter in comparative student
> > knowledge of math and science.
>
> Bullxxxx. The reason the US is backwards is because it spends LESS
> than all other countries in the western world on public education,

Washington DC school district spends roughly $15,000 to $20,000 per
year on
EACH STUDENT, has the highest illiteracy rate of nearly any school
system in the nation,
but does accomplish the important goal of proving that more spending
does not
translate into more education.

> And your social system is so xxxxxx up that many schools have to
> employ metal detectors and police because you have lost your sense of
> community.

Yes, we have.  And ten million illegal immigrants who consider it a
personal affront to be asked to learn English have made at least some
slight contribution in that divisive regard.
>
> > A recent scandal was that elementary school students were secretly
> > video-taped in teacher-led chants of
> > "mmm-mmm-mmm Barak Hussein Obama"
>
> You mean they were hailing the chief?
> I thought that's what you wanted?

Nazi brownshirts also hailed the chief.
US law forbids politicization of children in school.
Big laugh, that.

> > see one such video 
> > athttp://fr.sevenload.com/videos/7yvebuv-School-kids-taught-to-praise-O...
>
> This film is of no importance whatever without the CONTEXT.

Exactly.  And your complete disconnect from contemporary American
society makes it a gargantuan task to provide that context, since you
reject every fact I present as a lie.

> > When the videos went viral, the school's only complaint was that the
> > video was unauthorized!
>
> > A more recent case, five American high school students were sent home
> > from school
> > for wearing American flag clothing on a day celebrated by Mexican
> > students.  (Cinco de Mayo)
> > They were told the display of US flags was disrespectful to the
> > Mexicans.
> > PS:  No Mexican students are EVER sent home for wearing Mexican flag
> > clothing--- on any day.

> America is country with 260 millions. And you have found two schools
> that you don't like the look of  - well big deal!

Okay, here is a list of the 23,482 schools with which I have serious
problems...
darn, I lost the list.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.

Reply via email to