*DNA* is the *derived* blending of "in-formation" bases focused on the ultimate *new* "projected" state.... inasmuch as *all* information (ordered pairs) stems from constructs derived from an individual's/ group's sense of the given* implicate order* - e,g., cross impact, vectors held within the matrix, etc. of the perceived contextual backdrop(s), the *confluence* most often gives rise to *"novel characteristics"* from the very act / process of 'conception.' I'd like it to the final "coalescence" of two colliding galaxies... Still, because of the "borrowing" from the *'parent nodes,' *an argument CAN be made that *despite* the "syntheses" involved, it is merely the * possibilities* are in the process of being *discovered/ uncovered*. I gues that in the spirit of Wittgenstein's spirit, this arguments/ distinctions made here may simply be a matter of *semantic 'gatherance,'* and therefore (again) derived from ostensibly a false / *contrived* 'dichotomy.'
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:37 AM, awori achoka <[email protected]>wrote: > Does this take us back to the biochemical formula behind each DNA code---is > it that, which is original?. > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:36 PM, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> As each organism is unique, then all DNA arrangements are original. >> >> >> On Aug 24, 5:31 pm, einseele <[email protected]> wrote: >> > The word idea is may be of conflict and so populated by different >> > concepts that I allow me to rephrase, can anything be an original? >> > Yes I think so, for instance DNA >> > So if something can be original, then the corresponding idea it is as >> > well, whatever means idea, DNA, etc. >> > This does not mean DNA cannot be copied, but to mean there is always >> > an original >> > >> > On 22 ago, 13:17, Awori <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > Is there such a thing as an original idea? Can ideas originate from >> > > without? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Epistemology" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<epistemology%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. >> >> > > > -- > > nubiaafrika.blogspot.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<epistemology%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
