Sorry about the terminology to which I've become TOO accustomed... these are
cosmological - cybernetic concepts. They have mainly to do with
*inference*in of lieu of the
*temporal aspects* (contextual backdrop) found operating in the space-time
continuum.  They are seen as archetypal and, as such, are then inherently *
nebulous* as they subsume so much of the specific "acumen" within today's
"expert systems."

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 3:35 AM, awori achoka <[email protected]>wrote:

> *----"mplicate order",  "in-formation bases", "new projected state"*----where
> do these come from?
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:37 PM, awori achoka <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Does this take us back to the biochemical formula behind each DNA
>> code---is it that, which is original?.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:36 PM, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> As each organism is unique, then all DNA arrangements are original.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 24, 5:31 pm, einseele <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > The word idea is may be of conflict and so populated by different
>>> > concepts that I allow me to rephrase, can anything be an original?
>>> > Yes I think so, for instance DNA
>>> > So if something can be original, then the corresponding idea it is as
>>> > well, whatever means idea, DNA, etc.
>>> > This does not mean DNA cannot be copied, but to mean there is always
>>> > an original
>>> >
>>> > On 22 ago, 13:17, Awori <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > Is there such a thing as an original idea? Can ideas originate from
>>> > > without?
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Epistemology" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<epistemology%[email protected]>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> nubiaafrika.blogspot.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> nubiaafrika.blogspot.com
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Epistemology" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<epistemology%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.

Reply via email to