This is always interesting...remember my simple non theory about energy-time, it could just be it...the electron.
But I don't know! On Dec 12, 2011 3:18 PM, "sadovnik socratus" <[email protected]> wrote: > Where does the information come from? > / Quantum Theory as Quantum Information / > ===… > # > Does information begin on the quarks level? > No. Quark cannot leave an atom. > Maybe does proton have quant of information? > No. Single proton has no quant of information. > Why? > Because information can be transfered only by > electromagnetic fields. And we don’t have a theory > about protono-magnetic fields. > # > In our earthly world there is only one fundamental > particle - electron who can transfer information. > Can an electron be quant of information? > Maybe at first glance this seems to be a rather senseless questions. > But . . . . . > Energy is electromagnetic waves (em). > In 1904 Lorentz proved: there isn’t em waves without Electron > It means the source of these em waves must be an Electron > The electron and the em waves they are physical reality > ============== > # > 1900, 1905 > Planck and Einstein found the energy of electron: E=h*f. > 1916 > Sommerfeld found the formula of electron : e^2=ah*c, > it means: e = +ah*c and e = -ah*c. > 1928 > Dirac found two more formulas of electron’s energy: > +E=Mc^2 and -E=Mc^2. > According to QED in interaction with vacuum electron’s > energy is infinite: E= ∞ > Questions. > Why does the simplest particle - electron have six ( 6 ) formulas ? > Why does electron obey five ( 5) Laws ? > a) Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass > b) Maxwell’s equations > c) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / Law > d) Pauli Exclusion Principle/ Law > e) Fermi-Dirac statistics > #. > What is an electron ? > Now nobody knows > In the internet we can read hundreds theories about electron > All of them are problematical > We can read hundreds books about philosophy of physics. > But how can we trust them if we don’t know what is electron ? > ====. > Quote by Heinrich Hertz on Maxwell's equations: > > "One cannot escape the feeling that these mathematical formulae > have an independent existence and an intelligence of their own, > that they are wiser than we are, wiser even than their discoverers, > that we get more out of them than was originally put into them." > ====. > Ladies and Gentlemen ! > Friends ! > Electron is not as simple as we think and, maybe, he is wiser than we > are. > ==========. > # > We know, there is no information transfer > without energy transfer. More correct: there is no quant > information transfer without quant energy transfer. > And the electron has the least electric charge. > It means it has some quant of the least information. > What can electron do with this information? > Let us look the Mendeleev / Moseley periodic table. > We can see that electron interacts with proton > and creates atom of hydrogen. > This is simplest design, which was created by electron. > And we can see how this information grows and reaches > high informational level. And the most complex design, > which was created by electron is the Man. > The Man is alive essence. Animals, birds, fish are alive essences. > And an atom? And atom is also alive design. > The free atom of hydrogen can live about 1000 seconds. > And someone a long time ago has already said, that if to give > suffices time to atom of hydrogen, he would turn into Man. > Maybe it is better not to search about "dark, virtual particles " > but to understand what the electron is, > because even now nobody knows what electron is. > ======================= > In my opinion the Electron is quant of information. > Was I mistaken? No ! > Because according to Pauli Exclusion Principle > only one single electron can be in the atom. > This electron reanimates the atom. > This electron manages the atom. > If the atom contains more than one electron > (for example - two), this atom represents " Siamese twins". > Save us, the Great God, of having such atoms, such children! > Each of us has an Electron, but we do not know it. > # > Many years ago man has accustomed some wild > animals (wolf, horse, cat, bull , etc.) > and has made them domestic ones. > But the man understands badly the four-footed friends. > In 1897 J. J. Thomson discovered new particle - electron. > Gradually man has accustomed electron to work for him. > But the man does not understand what an electron is. > By my peasant logic at first it is better to understand > the closest and simplest particle photon /electron and > then to study the far away space and another particles. > ==========. > Best wishes. > Israel Sadovnik. Socratus. > =====… > P.S. > The world of electron. > # > But maybe these electrons are World, > where there are five continents: > the art, > knowledge, > wars, > thrones > and the memory of forty centuries. > / Valery Brusov./ > ===============… > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
