On 10. Apr 2009, at 11:07, gr3go (via Nabble) wrote:
> The framerate is ~3FPS. > Observing the statistic overlay, the transmission+compression time > seems to be the botleneck. > > > Here is a screenshot of the statistic overlay: > http://g.imagehost.org/0880/statistics2.gif > > We use a 100mbit intranet. I tested the transfer speed, and it's > around 10MB/s. Your analysis is correct. Assuming an image size of 800x600, which is roughly what you seem to be using, your raw image size is around 1.4MB - which should give you >5FPS. I strongly suggest to upgrade to Gigabit ethernet, a switch and 4 cards should be around 100 Euros. The communication pattern (many-to-one) tends to be an issue for some network cards due to congestion on the destination host. The 0.6 tree contains a patch (sendToken) which you might try. Otherwise better compression should help you to get better performance. Again, the 0.6 tree has a patch (tightRLE), which is also already applied in the trunk. We are currently working on a plugin interface for compression which will be published with a few plugins. You can then write your own. HTH, Stefan. -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/EqPly-performance-problem-tp2615355p2615628.html Sent from the Equalizer - Parallel Rendering mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ eq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.equalizergraphics.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eq-dev http://www.equalizergraphics.com
