On 10. Apr 2009, at 11:07, gr3go (via Nabble) wrote:
Your analysis is correct. Assuming an image size of 800x600, which is
roughly what you seem to be using, your raw image size is around 1.4MB
- which should give you >5FPS.
I strongly suggest to upgrade to Gigabit ethernet, a switch and 4
cards should be around 100 Euros.
The traffic in the network is around 2.5MB/s. I tested the network, it is
working on ~10MB/s (file transfer).
I observed that the transfer time it's high only in certain moments, for
example: 5 seconds the system is running on ~15FPS, and then the transfer time
increases for a short period, and the fps is 2-3..(tested with a 320x240
config).
In this case should a better compression improve the overall performance?
Thanks for the quick response,
Adam
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/EqPly-performance-problem-tp2615355p2615667.html
Sent from the Equalizer - Parallel Rendering mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
eq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.equalizergraphics.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eq-dev
http://www.equalizergraphics.com
