On 14. Jan 2014, at 20:04, cpapado [via Software] 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Also, I was wondering, is there a plan to support installing (and finding via 
> CMAKE) both debug+release binaries for EQ (and related libraries) under the 
> same install path at some point? Visual Studio doesn't play nice when linking 
> Release-mode EQ libraries (that use the release runtime) with debug mode code 
> (that uses the debug runtime). 

We don't have any plans since this way of setting up things is a Windows-ism 
and not much development happens on Windows. 

If it is properly integrated in the CMake repository for Windows only, we would 
likely merge it. The places to start are Common.cmake, TargetHooks.cmake and 
PackageConfig.cmake.


HTH,


> 
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion 
> below:
> http://software.1713.n2.nabble.com/Porting-from-EQ1-2-to-EQ1-7-eq-ClientPacket-co-NodePacket-equivalents-tp7584706p7584717.html
> To start a new topic under Equalizer - Parallel Rendering, email 
> [email protected] 
> To unsubscribe from Equalizer - Parallel Rendering, click here.
> NAML

-- 
http://www.eyescale.ch
https://github.com/Eyescale/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/eilemann






signature.asc (858 bytes) 
<http://software.1713.n2.nabble.com/attachment/7584726/0/signature.asc>




--
View this message in context: 
http://software.1713.n2.nabble.com/Porting-from-EQ1-2-to-EQ1-7-eq-ClientPacket-co-NodePacket-equivalents-tp7584706p7584726.html
Sent from the Equalizer - Parallel Rendering mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
eq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.equalizergraphics.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eq-dev
http://www.equalizergraphics.com

Reply via email to