Makes sense to me
On 3/1/2016 8:49 AM, Thomas Watson wrote:
Right now the equinox project has the following sub-projects, each
with their own committer groups
rt.equinox - parent project, no real code here, but it does contain
the website
rt.equinox.framework - where the OSGi framework and Equinox native
launcher lives
rt.equinox.bundles - where everything else is, besides p2
rt.equinox.p2 - where p2 is
I plan to request the foundation fold rt.equinox.framework and
rt.equinox.bundles into the parent project rt.equinox. I do not think
there is a need to separate committers of the various equinox bundles
from committers of the framework/launcher or the website. I do not
plan to request p2 be folded into rt.equinox unless the existing p2
community of committers request that to happen. p2 is a fairly large
codebase so it makes sense to keep it separate if the committers want
that. But the rest of Equinox is not that large and maintaining 3
separate committer groups is not worth it in my opinion.
Committers, please voice your concerns if you have them.
Tom
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
