+1 - Ray
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Thomas Watson <[email protected]> wrote: > I have no objections to merging in p2. But I would like Pascal and other > p2 committers to agree first. > > Tom > > > > > > From: Stefan Xenos <[email protected]> > To: Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]> > Date: 03/01/2016 08:25 AM > Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups > Sent by: [email protected] > ------------------------------ > > > > I strongly agree. In fact, I'd go farther and merge in p2 as well. > Fragmenting the permissions encourages developers to work around problems > in the code they have commit rights to rather in the place where the fix > really belongs, and makes it unnecessarily hard to do large changes such as > rolling with deprecations. > > +1 > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016, 5:51 AM Martin Lippert <*[email protected]* > <[email protected]>> wrote: > +1 > > Cheers, > -Martin > > > > Am 01.03.2016 um 14:49 schrieb Thomas Watson <*[email protected]* > <[email protected]>>: > > > > Right now the equinox project has the following sub-projects, each with > their own committer groups > > > > rt.equinox - parent project, no real code here, but it does contain the > website > > rt.equinox.framework - where the OSGi framework and Equinox native > launcher lives > > rt.equinox.bundles - where everything else is, besides p2 > > rt.equinox.p2 - where p2 is > > > > I plan to request the foundation fold rt.equinox.framework and > rt.equinox.bundles into the parent project rt.equinox. I do not think > there is a need to separate committers of the various equinox bundles from > committers of the framework/launcher or the website. I do not plan to > request p2 be folded into rt.equinox unless the existing p2 community of > committers request that to happen. p2 is a fairly large codebase so it > makes sense to keep it separate if the committers want that. But the rest > of Equinox is not that large and maintaining 3 separate committer groups is > not worth it in my opinion. > > > > Committers, please voice your concerns if you have them. > > > > Tom > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > equinox-dev mailing list > > *[email protected]* <[email protected]> > > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > > *https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev* > <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev> > > _______________________________________________ > equinox-dev mailing list > *[email protected]* <[email protected]> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > *https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev* > <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev> > _______________________________________________ > equinox-dev mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > equinox-dev mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev > -- *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay) Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)
_______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
