Well, why not.

On 16-03-22 09:50 PM, Ian Bull wrote:
+1

Cheers,
Ian

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Raymond Auge <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    +1

    - Ray

    On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Thomas Watson
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I have no objections to merging in p2.  But I would like
        Pascal and other p2 committers to agree first.

        Tom





        From: Stefan Xenos <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        To: Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        Date: 03/01/2016 08:25 AM
        Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups
        Sent by: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------



        I strongly agree. In fact, I'd go farther and merge in p2 as
        well. Fragmenting the permissions encourages developers to
        work around problems in the code they have commit rights to
        rather in the place where the fix really belongs, and makes it
        unnecessarily hard to do large changes such as rolling with
        deprecations.

        +1


        On Tue, Mar 1, 2016, 5:51 AM Martin Lippert
        <[email protected]_ <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
        +1

        Cheers,
        -Martin


        > Am 01.03.2016 um 14:49 schrieb Thomas Watson
        <[email protected]_ <mailto:[email protected]>>:
        >
        > Right now the equinox project has the following
        sub-projects, each with their own committer groups
        >
        > rt.equinox - parent project, no real code here, but it does
        contain the website
        > rt.equinox.framework - where the OSGi framework and Equinox
        native launcher lives
        > rt.equinox.bundles - where everything else is, besides p2
        > rt.equinox.p2 - where p2 is
        >
        > I plan to request the foundation fold rt.equinox.framework
        and rt.equinox.bundles into the parent project rt.equinox.  I
        do not think there is a need to separate committers of the
        various equinox bundles from committers of the
        framework/launcher or the website.  I do not plan to request
        p2 be folded into rt.equinox unless the existing p2 community
        of committers request that to happen.  p2 is a fairly large
        codebase so it makes sense to keep it separate if the
        committers want that.  But the rest of Equinox is not that
        large and maintaining 3 separate committer groups is not worth
        it in my opinion.
        >
        > Committers, please voice your concerns if you have them.
        >
        > Tom
        >
        >
        > _______________________________________________
        > equinox-dev mailing list
        > [email protected]_ <mailto:[email protected]>
        > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
        unsubscribe from this list, visit
        > _https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev_

        _______________________________________________
        equinox-dev mailing list_
        [email protected]_ <mailto:[email protected]>
        To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
        unsubscribe from this list, visit_
        _
        
_https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev________________________________________________
        equinox-dev mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
        unsubscribe from this list, visit
        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev


        _______________________________________________
        equinox-dev mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
        unsubscribe from this list, visit
        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev




-- *Raymond Augé*
    <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> (@rotty3000)
    Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.*
    <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay)
    Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
    (@OSGiAlliance)

    _______________________________________________
    equinox-dev mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
    unsubscribe from this list, visit
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev




--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource


_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev

_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev

Reply via email to