"As for Mark from Texas--you make a good case for avoiding EOC if you've signed up more people like you."
In my opinion, this is an example of the opposite of keeping negative personal remarks out of the discussion. Kevin --- In [email protected], "Ralph Finch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hartmut, you hit the nail on the head: > > "As long as the national EOC is seeing its duties in organizing a national > fly-in and publishing a monthly newsletter, I see no reason join. And so do > many others. > > "Folks, the national fly-in and the newsletter should be the occasion where > the work for our Ercoupes is being summarized, they should support the > cause, not be understood as the cause." > > To those who spend large amounts of time organizing flyins and social > events, especially Syd and Dan H: First, thanks. I have enjoyed a few of > those. But you have also expressed your dissatisfaction at the lack of > response. Dan, what if you had spent your many hours lobbying the FAA > instead of writing the California EOC newsletters? > > I believe there are 3 main reasons for a type club: > > 1. Serve as a forum for exchange of technical information, buy/sell market, > and so on. > 2. Lobby FAA and other agencies for issues relevant to that type. > 3. Organize social events. > > Before the Internet a type club was the sole main forum for #1. Now the > email lists have taken over that role. Even the RV folks, which are very > active, have shifted away from Van's RVator newsletter to web and email > lists for tech info. Likewise us Coupers. > > EOC seems to do nothing about #2. All effort goes into #3, and the EOC > therefore attracts the social people. But that seems to be insufficient > reason for a lot of us--me included--to remain a member. > > As for Mark from Texas--you make a good case for avoiding EOC if you've > signed up more people like you. > > Ralph Finch > N. California >
