John Cooper wrote:
>"THERE ARE NO CERTIFICATED AIRCRAFT THAT ARE ELIGIBLE AS A LIGHT 
SPORT AIRCRAFT".<
This is in fact true.  However, what counts is there are a few certificate
aircraft which ARE eligible to be operated by the holder of a sport pilot
license.
For some reason, the light sport pilot is often confused with the light
sport plane.  I for one can tell them apart even in a dark hangar...  ;)

John,

Please forgive me but I think I'll disagree on the semantics and legal
definition, not on your meaning.

The beginning of the Sport Pilot rule changes starts with the "definition"
of Light Sport Aircraft.  That sets the definition of those words into the
"law" (regulation) of the land.

Those words are:

PART 1—DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Amend §1.1 by adding the following definitions in alphabetical order to
read as follows:
§1.1 General definitions.
* * * * *
Consensus standard means, for the purpose of certificating
light-sport aircraft, an industry-developed consensus standard that applies
to aircraft design, production, and airworthiness. It includes, but is not
limited to, standards for aircraft design and performance, required
equipment, manufacturer quality assurance systems, production
acceptance test procedures, operating instructions, maintenance and
inspection procedures, identification and recording of major repairs and
major alterations, and continued airworthiness.
* * * * *
Light-sport aircraft means an aircraft, other than a helicopter or
powered-lift that, since its original certification, has continued to meet
the
following:
(1) A maximum takeoff weight of not more than––
(i) 660 pounds (300 kilograms) for lighter-than-air aircraft;
(ii) 1,320 pounds (600 kilograms) for aircraft not intended for
operation on water; or
(iii) 1,430 pounds (650 kilograms) for an aircraft intended for
operation on water.
(2) A maximum airspeed in level flight with maximum
continuous power (VH) of not more than 120 knots CAS under standard
atmospheric conditions at sea level.
(3) A maximum never-exceed speed (VNE) of not more than
120 knots CAS for a glider.
(4) A maximum stalling speed or minimum steady flight speed
without the use of lift-enhancing devices (VS1) of not more than 45 knots
CAS at the aircraft’s maximum certificated takeoff weight and most critical
center of gravity.
(5) A maximum seating capacity of no more than two persons,
including the pilot.
(6) A single, reciprocating engine, if powered.
(7) A fixed or ground-adjustable propeller if a powered aircraft
other than a powered glider.
(8) A fixed or autofeathering propeller system if a powered
glider.
(9) A fixed-pitch, semi-rigid, teetering, two-blade rotor system, if
a gyroplane.
(10) A nonpressurized cabin, if equipped with a cabin.
(11) Fixed landing gear, except for an aircraft intended for
operation on water or a glider.
(12) Fixed or repositionable landing gear, or a hull, for an
aircraft intended for operation on water.
(13) Fixed or retractable landing gear for a glider.

So, in fact, I think the FAA wienies were wrong in their statement that
"THERE ARE NOT CERTIFICATED AIRCRAFT THAT ARE ELIGIBLE AS LIGHT SPORT
AIRCRAFT"

True there are none that are eligible as Special Light Sport Aircraft.  But,
if the actual airplane meets the definition quoted above, then it is, by
definition, a Light Sport Aircraft.

Ed

Reply via email to