----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----
At 02:41 PM 5/9/03 -0400, Greg Bullough wrote: >----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any >advice in this forum.]---- > > >The IA working on N99387 is claiming that not only does AD-2202-26-02 >make SB31 mandatory, it makes two other SB's mandatory because >SB31 refers to them. > >The IA is digging >in his heels, claiming that the inspection...'In accordance with the >Procedures Section of Univari Aircraft SB No. 31...'" means that >you have to do the other two SB's because the first refers to it as >part of the procedure. > >Any insights? One of these days, Greg, I'm gonna publish my full diatribe on the IA as Artist. In it, I grant their responsibility, but decry the total lack of standardization = why it passes one year, but not the next. You might consider consider cutting your losses with this person, and engaging another. Percy, In Portland, with a 'real' IA. Note, I said 'real,' not 'cheap.' ========================================================================== ==== To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers-tech/
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
