----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----
Ooops...yea...thanks. Page 5 was what I was really trying to find. Didn't go far enough. Roger ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 4:02 PM Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] C75 to C85 > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > > In a message dated 2/25/2004 3:03:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > << it appears > that my prop, a 1B90CM 7351, is ok on 85 hp with a maximum rpm of not above > 2600. >> > > You didn't read the whole thing! ;~) > > Go down to page 5 and you'll see the specific engine/prop combination limits. > > As far as cutting the length down to allow the engine to spin up faster, > that's a benificial side effect, but not the real issue. Absent vibration and > regulatory issues, alternatively you could pitch the prop finer and accomplish > the same thing. The main reason to change the length is to eliminate > potentially damaging resonances in the prop/crankshaft assembly. > > John > ========================================================================== == == > To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm > Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers-tech/ > > > ========================================================================== ==== To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers-tech/
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
