Whoops, I looked through TC 3A19 a little to fast. Looking at it again I see that it also includes the C152. It appears the spinner is not required on the 150 but is on the 152. I would guess this has to do with cooling requirements on the Lycoming.
Kevin1 In [email protected], "kgassert" <kgass...@...> wrote: > > Type certificate 3A19 for the C150 list a spinner so it is required, unlike > the Ercoupe TC A-718 which does not list one. > > Kevin1 > > --- In [email protected], "David Winters" <WINTERSPATENTLAW@> > wrote: > > > > Um, I think you missed my point. > > > > I give no legal advice here, but am, on occasion, compulsively > > subject to applying the detailed analytical methodology of that illustrious > > and infamous profession. > > > > My point was that we must define, and classify the category of the > > component before we can identify the proper authority governing it. > > > > The easiest starting point would probably be to research known > > analygous technologies. For example, as I recall, the spinner IS required > > on a Cessna-150. So, the question is, for that aircraft where is this > > required component listed, and not listed? And what can this tell us about > > our own ships documentation? > > > > Dave Winters > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > Behalf Of Bill BIGGS > > Sent: Wednesday, 02 September, 2009 11:35 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Re: Skull cap spinner > > > > > > > > > > > > I think you hit the nail right on the head! > > Bill > > > > > > _____ > > > > To: [email protected] > > From: thesumak@ > > Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:16:04 -0400 > > Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Re: Skull cap spinner > > > > > > > > No disrespect intended to David, William, John or anyone else, but I'm not > > sure it's reasonable to assume that insurance people, FAA reps, IAs, widows, > > and most lawyers obsess about these sorts of details at the same velocity as > > us. > > > > Thank you so much Syd, Kevin, Kevin's FSDO, Bill Biggs and I guess Fred > > Weick for giving us an opinion on this. > > > > Respectfully, > > Bill > > > > > > > > David said: LAWYER TYPE QUESTION: Are wings on the required equipment > > list? If not, does this make them not required like the spinner? (In > > short, is the spinner "equipment" or an integral part of the aircraft ?) > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > HotmailR is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Try it now. > > <http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US: > > WM_HYGN_faster:082009> > > >
