Mike,

 

You are indeed a brave man, stepping into this bear cage.  

I, for one, am appreciative of your (Univair's) efforts to minimize the
potential of an AD that goes far beyond anything that may actually be needed
while protecting both us and your company.  I also can appreciate the need
for not making statements that might be used against you at some future
point.  

 

And yes, I am one of those people who have at times been less than impressed
with an answer, or lack thereof, to a question I posed. However; I have
always received a return call or e-mail with the information I needed.  I
have also benefited from the knowledge and patience of your personnel, who
have at times no doubt wished, "that idiot on the phone knew what he
wanted."

 

I will ask that you (Univair) consider one additional item in this and
future situations: Communication.  

Even if there is no real information that can be shared, at least let the
fleet know that you are aware of the situation.  I believe a short email to
this forum simply acknowledging a problem, or potential problem, would go a
long ways towards good customer relations and keeping us calm.

 

One last point: In your message you referred to "your forum."  It is also
your forum.  A forum is a discussion, a give and take of ideas and
information; should you have questions about what is going on with the
fleet; you can ask.  Should you see bad or wrong information being
propagated, you could caution to "check the manuals."   Of course, that
would be during your spare time after memorizing the part numbers for that
upside down, left handed, whatzit, that is screwed to the gizmo.

 

For now; all we can do is await the FAA's next move.

 

As for myself, consider the "credit" given.  I thank you for what you have
done thus far.  

 

Tommy Terry

N93929

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of univair
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ercoupe-tech] Let's step back and take a deep breath here.

 

  

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Mike Sellers 
To: michael.sellers@ <mailto:michael.sellers%40comcast.net> comcast.net 
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 3:52 PM

The Coupe series had several spar cap designs in the course of its
manufacture. There is no one single drawing that states the number and size
of holes. However, the bucket seat installation was approved from s/n 113
through the end of production. There were several spar caps. All had holes.
Some had more than others. Some had bigger holes than other. Center sections
have been swapped, spar caps replaced, 337 installations made and a lot of
installations with no documentation. There is no single souce of
information. Our position puts us in a situation that none of you have and
we cannot fulfill every request for information because we have multiple
responsibilities in matters such as this. 

You have a disclaimer on your forum that none of you are engineers or have
any official status in providing technical information. Well, we do. There
is likely litigation that will arise from this accident. An unguarded
comment, speculation or just general B.S. becomes fodder for a lawyer. We
have been doing our job for 63 years. We know how this process works and we
also know we cannot just go running our mouths. None of you would want to be
served to testify in a trial. I don't want to be either. 

Every time one of these service issues come out, regardless of aircraft, we
are sorry S.O.B.s for providing airplane parts. Then, some of you find out
that there is merit to these ADs and then things die down. After 31 years I
look forward to ADs and Service Bulletins like a root canal. I wish you
could understand all of the challenges we face on a daily basis to provide
parts for your 60 year old aircraft. The Cessna 120 is just as old as your
aircraft. The original manufacturer of the aircraft is still around. Cessna
has resolved this same problem we have by discontinuing most of the parts
for that aircraft. We have to play by the same rules they do. We could sell
parts cheaper if we operated out of our basements and did this in our spare
time, but we are 50 people doing our jobs in a 66,000 sq ft building. We are
regulated by an agency who can padlock our front door if they so choose. 

We supply parts for over 40 airplanes. I didn't know what gauge wire was
used on the instrument panel lights for a 108-2 when asked one day. I had to
take a bunch of crap over that by a customer because as type certificate
holder, "I am supposed to know this." Well I do know the thickness of J-3
struts and the part number for the engine mount rubbers on an O-320. We know
that. This is our job. We know the part number for the rubber doughnuts on
the Coupe. We sell those all the time and thousands of other bits of
information. There is about 75 years of collective aviation experience in
our sales office. I didn't count my years growing up in the business in that
figure. I could fudge that and put us over the 100 year mark. We need to
sell parts to stay in business. However, I was expected to know this all
important information about wire off the top of my head. Also, it would
result in no sale. Not knowing it makes us suspect and stupid in the eyes of
some individuals. In 31 years I have only been asked that very important
question about Stinson insturment panel wire once. Nobody else has ever been
asked. 18 gauge for those who need to know. 

Now, for the important stuff: Roger Caldwell was here today. Engineering and
the company President and CEO were part of the meeting. It lasted about 90
minutes. As I mentioned before and want to emphasize, we will not speculate
or debate this matter in a public forum. I am not at liberty to discuss the
details of this meeting. I will say that I think we made a fairly compelling
case. What the FAA does at this point I do not know. I don't know if an AD
if forthcoming or not. If one does, there will be the NPRM process in which
to state your concerns. What I will share with you is this: We were very
emphatic that any AD that results from this matter needs to require
compliance with existing Ercoupe Service Bulletins 57, 58 and 58A. 

We know your concerns about this issue. Please give us a little credit here.

Regards,

Mike Sellers
Marketing and Sales Manager
Univair Aircraft Corp.



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.115/2403 - Release Date: 09/29/09
17:56:00


Reply via email to