Just curious... does the Aeromatic propeller allow a C or CD to remain compliant with the LSA criteria?
John On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Bill BIGGS <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The aeromatic was a problematic prop. That is why you do not see them very > often. > > As I recall there are some pretty ferocious ADs on them > > http://www.monocoupe.com/AeromaticPropDocs/FAAConcern20001011.pdf > > They predated small aluminum props and as soon as the aluminum props became > widely available the aeromatics were replaced. Same story as fixed pitch > wood props. > > http://www.monocoupe.com/AeroMaticPropDocsRevA.html > > New aeromatic parts including blades are still available but be prepared to > mortgage the house and kids. > > http://www.aeromatic.com/ > > > > How about an Everel: http://www.notplanejane.com/aeromatic.htm > > Bill > ------------------------------ > To: [email protected] > From: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:21:09 +0000 > Subject: [ercoupe-tech] Re: Aeromatic Propeller > > > There was one at OSH last year but I did not get a chance to talk to the > owner and he was not parked with the group. > > Kevin1 > > --- In [email protected], "Donald" <dongen...@...> wrote: > > > > Over in the Ercooupe Info Main Home page, there exists data on an Ercoupe > using an Aeromatic Propeller. The results were dramatic enough, has anyone > got one of those propellers on their coupe, or has flown behind one? > > > > > > ------------------------------ > Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it > now.<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/> > >
