William Two on board aprox 375lb. Throttle control and many more things as carb neat flap, intake spider, engine's mount position etc has been checked and now in order I hope this is the only remaining to be corrected. Thanks regards Kostas
--- Στις Κυρ., 13/06/10, ο/η William R. Bayne <[email protected]> έγραψε: Από: William R. Bayne <[email protected]> Θέμα: Re: [ercoupe-tech] Aileron hinge placement Προς: [email protected] Ημερομηνία: Κυριακή, 13 Ιούνιος 2010, 20:09 Hi Kostas, You have a "climb" prop that is within static rpm limits, but your observed climb rate and speed are low and this is likely because of the incorrect location of the aileron hinges.. You might also check the throttle control to verify that it fully opens the carburetor butterfly as operated from the cockpit. How much do the "two on board" typically weigh ;<) Regards, WRB -- On Jun 13, 2010, at 10:50, kostas vegas wrote: > > > Hi William > > 1. Static rpm 2200 at the nearest ISA condition > 2. Max airspeed seen at 2400, 95mph > 3. My engine is C85 12F > 4. Metal McCauley > 5. 71-48 > > The engine is overhauled and did so far 150 hours only; I don't have other > problem despite the low speed. > At still and almost ISA air conditions with two on board and full fuel she's > climbing on about 550 fpm. > Any further idea is welcome. > > Thanks regards > Kostas > > > --- Στις Κυρ., 13/06/10, ο/η William R. Bayne <[email protected]> > έγραψε: >> >> Από: William R. Bayne <[email protected]> >> Θέμα: Re: [ercoupe-tech] Aileron hinge placement >> Προς: [email protected] >> Ημερομηνία: Κυριακή, 13 Ιούνιος 2010, 17:37 >> >> >> Hi Kostas, >> >> Several questions: >> >> 1. What is your static rpm at full power? >> >> 2. What is your Indicated Airspeed at 2400 rpm? >> >> 3. Is your engine still the original 75 hp? >> >> 4. Do you have the original wood Sensenich prop or a Metal McCauley? >> >> 5. What is the pitch and diameter of your prop? >> >> The reason I ask is that your performance appears low. >> >> According to Ercoupe Service Memorandum No. 37, Appendix "A", a 415-C at >> 1260 lb. gross., 75 hp fitted with a McCauley 1A-90 73-51 prop and "air >> conditions...very close to standard for all of of the tests" achieved 109 >> mph at 2275 rpm. With that prop at 1260 gross wt. they were able to take >> off in 520' observed 710 fpm climb. >> >> The preceding is better performance than most get with the 85 hp "upgrade" >> with 71 " diameter props. I believe that is because of two things. The >> earlier "steel" main landing gear had less drag than the later aluminum main >> landing gear, and the larger diameter prop was more efficient (so long as >> the engine could spin it up to a maximum rpm in flight of 2500 rpm). >> >> Regards, >> >> William R. Bayne >> .____|-(o)-|____. >> (Copyright 2010) >> >> --
