The magazine is Sport Aviation and the author is listed as a private pilot and 
an FAA Ground Instructor who has been flying light aircraft including 
ultralights for almost 30 years. 
I was not overly impressed with the article as it was quite inaccurate and/or 
poorly edited. Since EAA consolidated several of their magazines into one, I 
have noticed several articles that followed a similar pattern and were not 
really worthy of publication. I'm sure that EAA's intent is to publish more 
articles by members; but it is too bad tbat they seem to be relaxing their 
editorial standards to do so.

John Roach
N 2427H  
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: "Donald" <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:21:53 
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: [ercoupe-tech] Re: Rudder Pedals - or not



That was pretty much my opinion of it too.

 [email protected], "Kevin" <kgass...@...> wrote:
>
> I read the article and he obviously borrowed the Ercoupe and knows nothing 
> about them. First he whines about a measly 10 MPH crosswind and then somehow 
> manages to take off in an Ercoupe with the ailerons into the wind. That must 
> have been hard on the nose wheel plowing it down the runway sideways. Good 
> thing he was on ice.
> 
> Kevin1
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Donald" <DonGeneda@> wrote:
> >
> > For those who got their Sport Pilot today, there is an article by a Dave 
> > Matheny on Crosswind Takeoff.  Is this correct?  Has anyone flown a coupe 
> > with and without the pedals?  Comments anyone?
> > Following is a quote from the article:  "Fortunately the Ercoupe I was 
> > flying had been modified so that its twin rudders were connected to actual 
> > rudder pedals, unlike the standard Ercoupe.  The original had its rudders 
> > and ailerons interconnected so that all turns were automatically 
> > coordinated.  This was a feature that dwsigner Fred Weick and other 
> > aviation heavyweights of the 1930s and 40s thought would increase safety by 
> > reducing the number of stall-spin accidents that have always plagued 
> > aviation.  They were right, as far as Ercoupes went, because they were 
> > virtually stall-spin proof, but the absence of independent rudder control 
> > in the standard model was a problem for crosswind maneuvering on runways"
> >
>


Reply via email to