On 9 Jul 2002, at 21:43, John Carmack wrote:
>
> This was an all stainless steel and Teflon check valve, but the Teflon had
> gotten rather hard and crumbly, and eventually fallen apart.  This was one
> of our very early purchases, so it had been exposed to peroxide over a year
> ago, and may have been slowly deteriorating since then, even though it
> hasn't been in peroxide flow service with much of any regularity at all. 
> Mark Henry (ex Beal propulsion engineer) had mentioned to us once that not
> all Teflon is completely peroxide compatible, and this seems to be an
> example of that.  Unfortunately, industrial suppliers don't make a
> distinction.
>

According to EI Dupont de Nemours

        http://www.dupont.com/teflon/coatings/basic_types.html

there are six basic types.  Regarding their inert properties, Dupont says 
they are all wonderful.  "Extremely resistant to chemical attack", or 
some such phrase of art.

Better information on Teflon properties was at

        http://www.omega.com/techref/fluoro.html

and at

        http://www.boedeker.com/ptfe_p.htm

Unfortunately, I found no mention of compatibility with HTP on either.

The Cole-Parmer chemical compatibility database, at

        http://www.coleparmer.com/techinfo/chemcomp.asp

rates PTFE Teflon as "Excellent" in compatibility with 100% HTP.  That's 
something, at least.

The "O-ring chemical compatibility guide" by Engineering Fundamentals, 
at

http://www.efunda.com/DesignStandards/oring/oring_chemical.cfm?SC=n
one&SM=Teflon%2C%20Virgin

says "0" (no data) on virgin teflon with hydrogen peroxide.

You'll want to read these two

        http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/SSC/H2O2CONF/afrolov.htm
        http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/SSC/H2O2CONF/feigenbaum.htm

just for general reference -- assuming you haven't already.

Chris
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to