On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:32:21 +0300, "Yossi Preminger"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I finally got some current data from FMC. Steven Yuan has gotten mixed
>> reactions internally to dealing with a commercial customer (not working on
>> a government contract), but it is being pursued. They may initially want
>> to rule out the use of the peroxide for manned vehicles, which seems to
>> freak people out.
>
>I'm sorry, didn't you use to live in the land of the FREE and home of the BRAVE ?
We still do. But freedom has always required bravery, and most people
- especially when they are speaking for their employer here in the
litigation capital of the world - don't feel very brave very often.
It's always easier to wimp out, to go along to get along.
(Some people are temperamentally incapable of that, thank goodness.)
>Is it even legal for them to tell you how you can use the product ?
Absolutely. They own it, and fundamental property rights give them
the right to set any condition they want to on its use. Anyone who
doesn't like those conditions has the right to shop elsewhere.
>Wouldn't it be cheaper for you to buy one of X-L's 20k$ machines, lots of 70%
>peroxide and concentrate it yourself ?
>You'd save money in the long run, obviate the need for dealing with high
>concentration vendors, and in the worst case scenario you
>can sell the machine.
But then he'd be in the peroxide concentration business. Rocket
people, even those using peroxide, try to stay out of the peroxide
concentration business if they can, and concentrate on doing rocketry.
(Ouch. That was not intentional, but I'll fork over a quarter anyway.
Pierce, do we have a sparger fund?)
-R
--
"Sutton is the beginning of wisdom -
but only the beginning."
-- Jeff Greason
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
