On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Randall Clague wrote:
> I'm thinking that we should start with an ogive, and get throttling,
> tracking, and recovery issues down.  Then if we think we can get
> significantly more performance out of a cone, we can switch nose
> cones.

People who really care about aerodynamic performance seem to generally
prefer ogives, in fact.  You see cones on a lot of launchers because they
are easier to build and it just doesn't matter that much to something that
will be out of the atmosphere quickly anyway. 

                                                          Henry Spencer
                                                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to