Is there actual test data on this temperature performance relationship? If you get 430 lbf. at 74 F would it be worth it to heat to 110 F. ? What is the danger point for heating 85% H2O2?
Randall Clague wrote: > On 28 Oct 2002 15:32:36 -0800, "Sean R. Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> > Did you guys read the Armadillo update, in particular the part about > >> >suspected correlation between milky exhaust and initial temperature of > >> >peroxide. > >> > >> Yep. Initial peroxide temperature has a pronounced effect on > >> catalytic activity; that's certainly a factor in the low performance > >> they're seeing. Doesn't mean there aren't others, but I but warming > >> the peroxide makes the problem go away. It's such a PITA, though. > > > >Seems like it's time for ERPS to start experimenting with electrically > >heated catalysts. > > Why? Armadillo is having performance problem which they suspect are > due to cold. ERPS isn't. > > -R > > -- > "...And the last thing I remember is asking, > 'What could go wrong?'" > _______________________________________________ > ERPS-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>----<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ........ Alex Fraser N3DER ......... ......... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ....... [~]_>^</\-[~]_>^</\-[~]_>^</\-[~]_>^< _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
