Sean Patrick Daly wrote:

SPD> I have been concentrating on the piston tank design so far, as it suits my
SPD> needs, and I am WAY behind most of you in the development cycle. The bladder
SPD> design looks to be much lighter and more efficient, but looks to be more
SPD> cumbersome to implement, so I'll stick to the piston for now.

SPD> Sean


Parting from a metallic tube of a certain precision and making
provision for a removable bulkhead, so you can mount the piston
or change a casket, could be a god solution.
But how would you put a piston inside of a filament wound composite
tank with integral bulkheads?
A bladder must be made from a material that is elastic and resistant
to the propellant used.
There exist virtually no elastic materials that can be used with
cryogenic propellants like LOX.
So pistons and bladders can be useful  means in certain cases but
not as a general solution to the problem of handling propellants
under changing accelerations.



Hans Ulrich Ammann
mailto:huammann@;aro.ch
http://www.spl.ch

_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to