On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 19:08:39 -0800, Adrian Tymes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Either peroxide is explosive or it isn't. Alas, it's not that simple. (Know how to spot the expert? He's the guy saying, "It's not that simple.") Peroxide is not an explosive regulated by BATF/ATFE. It's not on the explosives list, nor does it meet their definition of an explosive. >Now, if we are storing explosives (either peroxide or solids), how is >"magazine" defined? If it's just that in which one stores explosives, >then would our various containers - the container we haul it down in, >the tank in the rocket itself, etc. - qualify as magazines? No; think ammunition bunker. The closest thing we have to an explosives magazine is the buildings at the Ranch. >If so, would the existing licenses we have for peroxide storage (and the >blanket permit the previous regs - as set by DOT and California - issued >for transporting peroxide below a certain amount) qualify as a >"previously existing permit"? (I doubt it, at least for the "blanket >permit", but perhaps.) We have no licenses from DOT; we don't need them (thank goodness). AVA has permits for storage, but those are from the county hazmat guys, not the ATF. -R -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The only time an aircraft has too much fuel on board is when it is on fire." -Sir Charles Kingsford Smith _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
