[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

To do all this you would need a marketing team almost as big as the
engineering team.  What is the benefit of all this?  Credibility.  Public
recognition.  Cash inflows. Publicity.  "If you build it, they will come" is
one thing.  But "If you build it and promote the heck out of it" is another
thing entirely.

ERPS is a non-profit, dedicated to actually building and testing the
rockets.  Entire businesses have been made on purely marketing, without
any "real" product besides merchandising someone else's dream.  The two
are different exercises, and there are countless examples (in rocketry
and other fields where technical advancement is desired) of those who
start the latter to support the former, only to find their attention and
energy entirely consumed by the latter such that the former never
actually gets done.

That's not us.  Even if and when we finish ERPS's development program
and commercialize the results, I hope it will not be us.

Granted, marketing will be necessary when we go commercial.  The exact
forms of marketing that will help most is a matter of debate.  But if
and where marketing would derail engineering advancement, compared to
what progress could have been made without the relevant marketing
activity, marketing is something to be avoided, not embraced.

_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to