On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Randall Clague wrote:
> >Additional mobile service vehicles could be made and driven to distant
> >locations...
>
> IMHO, this takes much of the sting out of the "second site is too
> expensive" argument, thus relieving TSTO of the RTLS requirement and
> making it much more effective.
Provided, of course, that there is a suitable landing location under the
flight path at about the right distance. "Suitable" obviously includes
political considerations as well as technical ones... The nice thing
about an RTLS lower stage is that it gives you all-azimuth operation with
only one operations site to look after.
Henry Spencer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
