David Weinshenker wrote:
Hmmm... I note that one of the themes is to be: "comparison of personnel protection equipment, medical surveillance".As Henry Spencer so famously observed, the only good thing you can say about it is it's not radioactive. ;->
This sounds like "we've been using hydrazine for all these
years and we're still not sure how not to poison ourselves
with it..."
Aleta
Actually, I think I was the first to sarcasticly suggest making dangerous propellants worse, in the context of ozone/acetylene:
<http://www.google.com/groups?q=radioactive+flox&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=d&as_drrb=b&as_mind=12&as_minm=5&as_miny=1992&as_maxd=15&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2003&selm=44ut1r%244cm%40shiva.usa.net&rnum=9&filter=0>
Ah, memories :)
Doug
_______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
