2008/9/14 Jon Zeppieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> A standard way to get a stack trace would be very useful.  A
> callee.caller-based stack trace will break under recursion, right?  So
> it's not the right thing for traces anyway.

Indeed, a better way to get a stack trace would be to have some way of
serialising the current stack of activation frames. There's strong
arguments against giving actual programmatical access to the
activation frame stack, however.
-- 
David "liorean" Andersson
_______________________________________________
Es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to