On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Jorge Chamorro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El 14/09/2008, a las 21:30, Mark S. Miller escribió:
>
>> The arguments object itself is often passed in order for function F to
>> give function G access to the argument list F with which was called.
>> This seemingly innocent operation should not also inadvertently
>> provide G with the ability to call F. F might otherwise be
>> encapsulated within some larger abstraction.
>
>
> Hmm, the problem is 'callee' being a property of 'arguments' ?
> or the functionality that 'callee' provides ?
>
> IOW, could we have instead a ('standalone') 'callee' property (that
> isn't to be innocently passed on) ?
>
...as a property of what?
Any magically bound variable breaks TC. The expression
callee
should have the same meaning as
(function() { return callee; })()
...and it clearly does not.
_______________________________________________
Es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
