On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 12, 2009, at 9:41 PM, Peter Michaux wrote: > >> Not at all and it is unfortunate it came across that way. It is at the >> whole chain of events which is long: "for the ECMAScript committee to >> standardize methodMissing, for browsers to implement it and for old >> browsers to disappear". > > Standardizing a target bytecode or even AST encoding would take no less > time, almost certainly more. > > We should talk about methodMissing for Harmony.
Great but to be clear, methodMissing was just an example of a feature some desire. I could have used "classes", "continuations", "threads", etc all of which people have tried to add to ES. Peter _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
