On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote: > > I think it should matter. The vendors should be asked to give a reason > that makes technical sense. That this option "could not be implemented > in a high-performance manner" does not make sense -- which means that it > is quite possible that the vendors were asked the wrong question, or had > some misunderstanding about how such a specification could be > implemented.
I don't believe there was any misunderstanding, but regardless: if you are able to convince the implementors to implement something other than what is currently specced in HTML5, I'm very happy to change the spec to require that instead. I don't really mind how this works, I just want to make sure the spec is clear on what is required and that the spec matches what actually gets implemented, and ideally I would like it to not contradict the ES specs as it unfortunately does now. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list Es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
