There didn't seem to be any follow-up discussion on this, that I could see. Looking at the (top-level) change logs for es5conform and sputniktests, you can see there has been some working going on since Mark's post.
Any status on the individual suites, a combination of the suites, or re-hosting them? On Sep 12, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote: > Currently, there are two open source EcmaScript test suites and one open > source JavaScript test suite. > > * http://es5conform.codeplex.com/ for testing the differences between ES5 and > ES3 > * http://code.google.com/p/sputniktests/ for testing ES3 > * http://www.mozilla.org/js/tests/library.html for testing Mozilla's > JavaScript. > > In committee, we all agreed that we like the structure of the first two, as > they follow the structure of the spec. We also agreed that we'd like the > results of developing and possibly merging these test suites to be hosted at > ecmascript.org, and to eventually earn some kind of status as the official > conformance test suites. The open question is where to do the development. > Having the development be split among three, or even two, code development > sites that some participants might regard as partisan, and that operate in > somewhat different ways, is doable but not optimal. > > Current resources at ecmascript.org that one might start from for joint > development are http://hg.ecmascript.org/ and http://bugs.ecmascript.org/ . > Are these adequate starting points? Are there other suitable resources hosted > by Ecma? Could there be? Is this realistic? What about other alternatives > like sourceforge or github? Or are we better off just sticking with the > current split development that, frankly, is working rather well? Patrick Mueller - http://muellerware.org/ _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
