On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Christian Plesner Hansen wrote:
Sorry, I missed Mark's original message. Who maintains *.ecmascript.org?
I do with help from others (David-Sarah has helped fix up the trac, for example).
If we can expect it to be reliable I would have no problem moving development of the sputnik test suite there. Actually I would be prepared to move as soon as we can agree on what structure we want. One small issue is how to review code changes. Sputnik already uses a "third-party" tool (as in it's developed by google but not an integrated part of code.google.com) and for now we could continue to use that, just from a different base repository.
Can you mail me about what is required to host Sputnik and this tool, in detail? Thanks.
As for merging sputnik with es5conform and the subset of the mozilla tests that reflect the spec I see no reason why we couldn't do that, other than the work it would take to merge the heterogeneous frameworks.
This is a lot of work, so the best way to do it is according to a plan we all agree with, but almost ceratinly not with any "big bang" integration. Just lots of patches. The separate tests will have their own integrity and greater self-consistency for a while. If we get a single unified suite, we'll know when it is "ready".
/be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
