On Nov 22, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Andreas Gal wrote: > Executive summary: iterate() is equivalent to enumerate(), both should work > with for-in. We already agreed to accept enumerate, forcing iterate() into > its own syntax is arbitrary. We can discuss sacrificing future-proofness and > stringify return values of iterators
Stringify return values of iterators *only* when for-in is driving the iteration (I'm sure you meant ;-). I somehow suspect stringifying the iterator next() return value from for-in machinery will not placate folks who want for-in not to be metaprogrammable. But harmony:proxies is already spec'ed with an enumerate trap. Something does not add up. You're right that the line between your items (2) and (3) is arbitrary. BTW, I found a v8 implementation of proxies by Sam Shull, via TomVC's site: https://github.com/brickysam26/node-proxy/tree/master/src/ Thought I'd pass that on along to es-discuss to make up for the usual interminable iteration arguments :-P. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
