On Dec 22, 2010, at 9:31 PM, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote: > On 2010-12-23 05:14, Brendan Eich wrote: >> On Dec 22, 2010, at 7:49 PM, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote: >> >>> The constraint that the inspector be written in ES5 seems to be a purely >>> artificial one. All of the commonly used browsers have debugger extensions. >> >> Nope, our little startup (mine, MonkeyBob's, and ReliableFred's -- plus the >> boss) is writing a cross-browser framework and app. No native code, let >> alone deoptimizing magic VM-ported code for each top JS VM. > > You don't need the debugger to be part of your framework and app, in order > to use it for development.
Nope, the *inspector* (not a debugger) is a higher-level tool customized to our framework and app, written in cross-browser JS, using jQuery and whatever's hawt. Why you keep changing terms of my example is beyond me. Not your startup! > (There, concise enough this time?) Yes! /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
