2011/3/25 Kevin Smith <[email protected]>: > As a simple matter of taste, I find the # symbol to be quite ugly and have > been thinking of alternatives for shortening function expression syntax. > In working with my own wonky version of promises, I continue to make the > same typing error over and over again. This is something like what I mean > to type: > obj.doSomething().then(function(val, err) > { > ... > }); > But I find myself typing this instead: > obj.doSomething().then(val, err) > { > ... > }); > The problem isn't so much the extra typing of the "function" keyword, but > the profusion of parens. I'd like to suggest the following form instead. > obj.doSomething().then(<val, err> > { > ... > }); > Correct me if I'm wrong, but since expressions cannot start with "<", this > shouldn't present any problems for a top-down parser. Is that right?
Does this cause ambiguities with E4X ? https://developer.mozilla.org/en/e4x > Thanks, > khs > > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
