Implicit functions?
globalMethod(argument)
{
// implementation
};
AnObject.prototype.method(value)
{
// whatevs
};
On 25 Mar 2011, at 17:28, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> Oh, boogers! : )
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Mike Samuel <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2011/3/25 Kevin Smith <[email protected]>:
> > As a simple matter of taste, I find the # symbol to be quite ugly and have
> > been thinking of alternatives for shortening function expression syntax.
> > In working with my own wonky version of promises, I continue to make the
> > same typing error over and over again. This is something like what I mean
> > to type:
> > obj.doSomething().then(function(val, err)
> > {
> > ...
> > });
> > But I find myself typing this instead:
> > obj.doSomething().then(val, err)
> > {
> > ...
> > });
> > The problem isn't so much the extra typing of the "function" keyword, but
> > the profusion of parens. I'd like to suggest the following form instead.
> > obj.doSomething().then(<val, err>
> > {
> > ...
> > });
> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but since expressions cannot start with "<", this
> > shouldn't present any problems for a top-down parser. Is that right?
>
> Does this cause ambiguities with E4X ? https://developer.mozilla.org/en/e4x
>
> > Thanks,
> > khs
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > es-discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
