Oh, boogers! : )
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Mike Samuel <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/3/25 Kevin Smith <[email protected]>: > > As a simple matter of taste, I find the # symbol to be quite ugly and > have > > been thinking of alternatives for shortening function expression syntax. > > In working with my own wonky version of promises, I continue to make the > > same typing error over and over again. This is something like what I > mean > > to type: > > obj.doSomething().then(function(val, err) > > { > > ... > > }); > > But I find myself typing this instead: > > obj.doSomething().then(val, err) > > { > > ... > > }); > > The problem isn't so much the extra typing of the "function" keyword, but > > the profusion of parens. I'd like to suggest the following form instead. > > obj.doSomething().then(<val, err> > > { > > ... > > }); > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but since expressions cannot start with "<", > this > > shouldn't present any problems for a top-down parser. Is that right? > > Does this cause ambiguities with E4X ? > https://developer.mozilla.org/en/e4x > > > Thanks, > > khs > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > es-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
