> I think I like <: about as much as <|. I'm not sure which is going to be > more readable across a variety of fonts and sizes. <| does seem to be > generally more visually distinct.
I just have to say that the pipe symbol in many fonts makes for a really hideous triangle. It doesn't line up at all with the top and bottom of the less-than/greater-than symbols. > I suspect that to most JS programmers the UML open triangle generalization > arrow head is at least as relevant a precedent as any type theory uses. In > other words,the relevancy of either isn't very high. Yeah. In fact, the analogy to type theory would have us read the <: symbol as a binary predicate, which isn't what's going on here at all. So... I don't find either of these lexemes very pleasant, but I don't have any beautiful alternatives to offer. Dave _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
