On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 14:46, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: >> <~ has the disadvantage that it looks somewhat similar to <- and thus -> > > <~ and <- are not backward-compatible extensions, consider function test(a,b) > { return a<-b; }.
how about the fish operator <><, easy to type. it clashes with e4x syntax, but I think it's unambiguous in the same way / is. _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
