On Jun 25, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: > Should we really constrain super calls in methods to be only of the > same-named method in the superclass? Conciseness is better but the > restriction seems worse. Is it necessary in Ruby or CoffeeScript?
Consider also that the ES.next 'super' proposals allow super.baz where super.baz is a property other than a method. That would not be possible with 'super'-only. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
