On Jun 25, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
>> D = (function() {
>> __extends(D, B);
>> function D(x, y) {
>> D.__super__.constructor.call(this, x);
>> this.y = y;
>> }
>> D.prototype.m = function(z) {
>> return 1 + D.__super__.m.call(this, z);
>> };
>> return D;
>> })();
>
>
> I wonder if using an IIFE isn’t counter-productive here:
> - D.__super__ refers to the binding of D inside the IIFE which means that the
> IIFE environment is will be kept alive.
It's no big deal. OTOH leaking the name seems like it could cause trouble.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
