On Jun 25, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov wrote: >> We should discuss this more concise 'super'-only, not 'super.foo' idea. Is >> it only for conciseness, or is the fact that it does not support 'super.bar' >> from within a method named 'foo' important? > > Of course it's mostly for conciseness.
I don't think it's just about conciseness. See my last message. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
