On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>
>> On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Rick Waldron wrote:
>>
>>> The more I think about it, I still can't come up with any really exciting
>>> use cases where Array.of would outshine anything that already exists. I say
>>> strike it from the wishlist.
>>
>> Higher-order programming with Array as constructing-function bites back for
>> the single-number-argument case. That's where Array.of helps.
>
> Yes, if you actually need to pass Array.of as a function argument. Of course
> if we have block lambdas you could just say:
>
> hof({|a|[a]})
> instead of
> hof(Array.of)
You know I <3 block-lambdas ;-).
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
