On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov wrote:
> On 10.07.2011 21:23, Brendan Eich wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Rick Waldron wrote:
>>
>>> The more I think about it, I still can't come up with any really exciting
>>> use cases where Array.of would outshine anything that already exists. I say
>>> strike it from the wishlist.
>>
>> Higher-order programming with Array as constructing-function bites back for
>> the single-number-argument case. That's where Array.of helps.
>>
>
> You mean when `Array` itself is passed as an argument?
>
> var o = (function (ArrayConstructor, ...rest) {
> return ArrayConstructor(...rest);
> })(Array, 10, 20, 30);
Yes. Now consider the case where you leave out the 20 and 30.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
